上新东方的时候,写做的老师讲,逻辑分析写做中的很多逻辑错误可以套用真题(单体)中的逻 [b]辑错误描述, 我总结了一下说法,希望对大家有用>>>:) [b]l Error type in the reasoning of argument [b]1. treating the cause of a sequence of events as if it were the result of [b]that sequence of events; [b]2. rejecting a possible explanation without suggesting an alternative [b]explanation; [b]3. failing to consider the possibility that those who did not become ill [b]shortly after eating the egg salad became ill later [b]4. treating a lack of proof that something is the case as constituting [b]sufficient proof that it is not the case; [b]5. overlooking the possibility that some people are more susceptible to [b]harmful bacteria than are other people; [b]6. fails to specify the percentage of pregnant women who suffer from [b]vitamin deficiency [b]7. gives insufficient information about why pregnant women have higher [b]vitamin requirements than do other groups; [b]8. fails to employ the same reference group for both uses of the term [b]“vitamin deficiency; [b]9. provides insufficient information about the incidence of vitamin [b]deficiency in other groups with high vitamin requirements [b]10. uses higher requirements in an ambiguous manner; [b]11. the argument reiterates its conclusion instead of providing a reason [b]for it. [b]12. the argument makes an irrelevant distinction between foreign and United [b]States manufacturers [b]13. the reason given for the ban undermines rather than supports the [b]conclusion [b]14. the reason given for the ban does not explain why images superimposed [b]on the United States flag are offensive; [b]15. the reason given for the ban applies only to a part of the group of [b]manufacturers whose flags are included in the ban, but necessarily to all [b]16. the reasoning is conclusive, that is, the conclusion cannot be false if [b]the statements offered in its support are true; [b]17. the reasoning is strong but not conclusive, if the statements offered [b]in support of the conclusion are true, they provide good grounds for that [b]conclusion, though it is possible that additional information might weaken [b]the argument. [b]18. the reasoning is weaken, the statements offered in support of the [b]conclusion, though relevant to it , by themselves provide at best [b]inadequate grounds for the conclusion. [b]19. the reasoning is flawed in that the conclusion no more than a [b]paraphrase of one of the pieces of evidence offered in its support. [b]20. the reasoning is flawed in that the argument treats evidence that a [b]factor is necessary to bring about an events as if it were evidence that [b]the factor is sufficient to bring about that event. [b]21. it proceeds as if a condition, which by itself is enough to guarantee a [b]certain result , is the only condition under which that result would occur [b]22. it bases a conclusion that is known to require two conditions on [b]evidence that bears on only one of those conditions [b]23. it explains one vent as being caused by another event, even though both [b]events must actually have been caused by some third, unidentified event [b]24. it treats evidence for the absence of one condition under which a [b]circumstance would occur as conclusive evidence that that circumstance will [b]not occur [b]25. evidence given to support the conclusion actually undermines it. [b]