1 The first piece of evidence that we would need in order to evaluate Dr. Karp’s claims
is information about whether or not Tertia and the surrounding island group have
changed significantly in the past 20 years.    2 Dr. Field conducted his observational study
20 years ago, and it is possible that Tertia has changed significantly since then.     3 For
example, if we had evidence that in the intervening years Westerners had settled on
the island and they introduced a more typical Western-style family structure, it would
certainly weaken Dr. Karp’s argument.       4 In that case, the original study could have been
accurate, and Dr. Karp’s study could be correct, as well, though his conclusion that Dr.
Field’s method is ineffective would be seriously weakened.

好吧 玩一个弱智的配对题吧 

a  指出和上句相关的某种可能性
b 指出如果这种可能性成立会有什么结论 
c 具体举例展开讨论这种可能性
d 提出需要哪方面的证据 

答案见论坛原帖

1 Another piece of evidence that might help us evaluate this claim involves the exact
locations where Dr. Karp’s interviews took place.      2 According to this article, Dr. Karp 
and his graduate students conducted interviews of “children living in the group of islands
that includes Tertia.”      3 If we were to learn that they never interviewed a single Tertian
child, it would significantly weaken the conclusion.     4 It could turn out to be the case, for
example, that children on Tertia are raised communally, whereas children on other
islands nearby are raised by their biological parents.

继续配对 

a 复述原题论证中的某个部分
b 提出需要哪方面的证据 
c 具体举例展开讨论这种可能性 
d 指出和上句相关的某种可能性 

答案见论坛原帖

1 In order to fully evaluate this article, we would also need to learn more about the
interview questions that Dr. Karp’s team used.    2 What exactly did they ask?     3 We 
don’t know, nor do we know what the children’s responses actually were.    4 What did they 
say about their biological parents?     5 The mere fact that they speak more frequently about
their biological parents than they do about other adults does not meant that they are
raised by their biological parents.      6 It would significantly undermine Dr. Karp’s argument
if it turned out that the children said things like how much they missed their parents or
how their parents had left them in a communal environment.      7 Without knowing WHAT
the children said, it is hard to accept Dr. Karp’s conclusion.

继续配对 这次有多选哦 

a 指出相关信息的匮乏 
b 质疑原题对某个事实的诠释 
c 提出需要哪方面的证据  
d 以提问形式说明需要的证据 
e 指出和上句相关的某种可能性
f 指出如果这种可能性成立会有什么结论 
g 总结对论证的质疑 

答案见论坛原帖

1 It is slightly more difficult to discuss the evidence we might need in order to
evaluate the more interesting claims in Dr. Karp’s article, namely his extension of the
results of his study to a conclusion that interview-centered methods are inherently
more valid than observational-centered approaches.     2 In order to fully evaluate this
claim, in fact, we would need to look at many more examples of interview-based and
observation-based anthropological studies and we would also need to look into
different study designs.    3 Perhaps Dr. Field did not conduct an effective observational
study, but other observational approaches could be effective.    4 In order to make such
grandiose claims, Dr. Karp really needs a lot of additional evidence (ideally a meta -
analysis of hundreds of anthropological studies).  

1 b 提出需要哪方面的证据  a 复述原题论证中的某个部分
2 c 具体说明需要的证据
3 d 指出和上句相关的某种可能性
4 c 具体说明需要的证据

答案见论坛原帖

原帖作者：tesolchina

原帖地址：http://bbs.gter.net/thread-1795856-1-1.html

©详细内容版友讨论请前往寄托论坛查看作者原帖，本文文字内容版权归寄托天下和寄托版友tesolchina所有。未经原作者允许，谢绝其它平台使用整体或任何部分的内容！